The Bank of Lithuania authorises and supervises crypto-asset service providers under MiCA.
Explore 8 mapped organizationsOfficial source for regulatory status: Bank of Lithuania: MiCA authorisation of crypto-asset service providers (supports: regulatory status, regulatory framework) · Bank of Lithuania: crypto-asset markets, licensing and supervision (supports: regulatory status, regulatory framework, regulatory timeline)
Local review · 2026-08-17
Next review: 2026-11-17
International virtual-asset standards, crypto tax reporting framework, and adoption methodology. Local rules can change; verify with the relevant authority before acting.
Tax
Regulation
Verify a provider
Adoption
A register helps verify the named entity and stated activity. It does not validate every asset, product, or risk.
Official adoption figures are shown with their linked source.
Source by figure: adoption: European Central Bank: 13.1% of Lithuanian respondents reported crypto-asset possession, SPACE 2024 Chart 41
Blue figures are older estimates without a verifiable official source: they are shown as context, not official data, and are not used to rank or score countries.
Europe · EUR
A MiCA licence authorises specific services: check its scope and currency with the Bank of Lithuania.
MiCA begins applying to crypto-asset service providers; the Bank of Lithuania administers national authorisations.
Lithuania's transition period for existing providers, as stated by the Bank of Lithuania, ends.
Official source for these events: Bank of Lithuania: crypto-asset markets, licensing and supervision (supports: regulatory status, regulatory framework, regulatory timeline)
The Bank of Lithuania is the national competent authority for licensing and supervising crypto-asset market participants under MiCA. A non-exempt undertaking must apply for and obtain a licence before providing crypto-asset services; the licence specifies the authorised services. Exempt financial institutions may begin certain services only when the authority considers their notification complete. Check the current licence, contracting entity, and exact service scope before acting.
Official source for this framework: Bank of Lithuania: MiCA authorisation of crypto-asset service providers (supports: regulatory status, regulatory framework) · Bank of Lithuania: crypto-asset markets, licensing and supervision (supports: regulatory status, regulatory framework, regulatory timeline)
Check the linked official regulatory register or portal before choosing a provider.
Confirm tax treatment with the linked official guidance and a local professional where appropriate.
Treatment depends on the token type, activity, and personal circumstances. Check VMI material and local tax advice.
Source: State Tax Inspectorate: virtual currencies and token taxation material (supports: tax treatment, deductions, filing deadline) · State Tax Inspectorate: income-tax legislation and official explanatory material (supports: tax treatment, deductions, filing deadline)
Confirm the applicable filing deadline with VMI before filing.
Source: State Tax Inspectorate: virtual currencies and token taxation material (supports: tax treatment, deductions, filing deadline) · State Tax Inspectorate: income-tax legislation and official explanatory material (supports: tax treatment, deductions, filing deadline)
VMI publishes specific material on virtual currencies, tokens, and taxation. No single rate is shown because a fixed rate was not verified as applying to every case.
Official tax guidance: State Tax Inspectorate: virtual currencies and token taxation material · State Tax Inspectorate: income-tax legislation and official explanatory material
| Country | Users / investors | Adoption | P2P Vol. | Status | Exchange |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇹 LithuaniaYou | No official figure | 13.1% of respondents (ECB SPACE, 2024) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
| 🇪🇸 Spain | No official figure | 4.8% holders (2021, Banco de Espana) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
| 🇵🇹 Portugal | No official figure | 12.0% of respondents (ECB SPACE, 2024) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
| 🇩🇪 Germany | No official figure | 6% bought or paid (Bundesbank, 2025) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
| 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | No official figure | 12% holders (2024, FCA) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
| 🇫🇷 France | No official figure | 9% holders (2025) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
| 🇮🇹 Italy | No official figure | 18% of financial decision-makers (CONSOB, 2024) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
| 🇳🇱 Netherlands | No official figure | >20% of investors (AFM, 2025) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
| 🇨🇠Switzerland | No official figure | ~6% of respondents (SNB, 2022) | No official figure | Regulated | — |
Continue your journey
Lithuania vs Spain
Access analysis, tools, and a community of active traders.