A privacy-enabled blockchain built by the makers of Daml for institutional finance.
Live market data
CoinGecko data; may be delayed.
No declared max supply: no FDV is computable, supply follows demand.
100.0% of the achievable supply is already circulating.
$0.19 -49.43% · Feb 3, 2026
Source: CoinGecko, snapshot of Sep 13, 2026. Figures may be delayed.
This asset is not mapped to a DefiLlama-tracked protocol or chain, or the provider reports no data for it. When a verified mapping exists, the table appears here.
Canton comes from Digital Asset, the company behind the Daml smart-contract language used in production by major banks and market infrastructure. The network connects permissioned institutional nodes while allowing privacy between participants, a design deliberately opposite to public-chain transparency. Its token is new to public markets, and its adoption story is measured in institutional integrations rather than retail wallets.
General research guidance, not analysis specific to this asset. Detail is pending.
Track the real organization or foundation behind the token, not just the ticker.
Separate token utility from price action before building a position.
Compare network usage, liquidity, incentives, and governance quality against nearby competitors.
Canton connects application-specific subnets over a shared synchronization ledger, so institutions transact with privacy between participants while the network coordinates globally. Digital Asset — the company behind the Daml smart-contract language long used by banks and market infrastructure — built it, and the DTCC's tokenization service for US treasuries, equities, and ETFs is preparing to launch on the network, the strongest institutional signal the sector has produced.
Fee and coordination unit for Canton network services
Staking for validator participation
The CC token pays for network services and staking on application subnets. The open question is whether public-token value accrues from institutional usage that is deliberately private and permissioned — fee flows inside private subnets do not automatically reach a public token, and that bridge is unproven.
The token is new to public markets with allocation details thinner than for public-chain launches. There is no long unlock history yet, so float analysis matters less than institutional integration milestones — each DTCC-style announcement moves the adoption story more than supply data does.
Network direction sits with Digital Asset and the member institutions running subnets, not with public token holders; token governance exists but is not the primary control plane. This is a design choice, not an oversight — regulated institutions will not put capital markets on a chain whose rules can flip by public vote.
Institutional adoption is slow and legible only through partner announcements
Public-market token governance over a permissioned network is untested
Competes with both public chains and private DLT at once
It describes itself as the first public blockchain with real privacy: anyone can read about and build toward the network, but participant visibility and data remain private between counterparties. It is neither a fully open public chain nor a private DLT — the design deliberately occupies the gap between the two.
The DTCC — the plumbing of US equities settlement — is preparing a tokenization service on Canton for tokenized US treasuries, equities, and ETFs. For a sector used to pilot announcements, live settlement infrastructure from the central securities depository is the institution signal with the most substance behind it.
Last verified:
Digital Asset · canton.network · primary source
Privacy-enabled public network positioning, Digital Asset's $135M raise, and DTCC tokenization service preparation on Canton.
Accessed
Pending linkage to a concrete organization on the map.
Adjacent asset in the same research context.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
Serves a comparable role, so the two are worth reading side by side.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
Serves a comparable role, so the two are worth reading side by side.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
