Sources and coverage

How we build the directory

We list perpetual products with official links and details we can attribute to the venue's own sources. Inclusion does not certify safety, legality, or suitability.

reference-directory candidates

candidates from independent sources

resolved dispositions out of 60

candidates pending review

partial review, profile not published

published non-archived products

Source review date: 2026-10-12. 2 archived profile is retained for historical context.

Inclusion criteria

We confirm that the product offers perpetual contracts and record its current lifecycle status.
We review the official domain, network or namespace, and execution and settlement model where the sources publish them.
We distinguish protocols, venues, frontends, and deployments. Multiple interfaces over the same contracts are not automatically counted as separate protocols.
Closed products are archived; products outside crypto perps and products without enough classification remain outside published profiles.

Sources and dates

We prioritize official protocol documentation, apps, terms, APIs, and announcements.
Each profile claim links to a source and shows when it was last checked.
Fees, leverage, access, markets, and collateral may depend on the account and change over time; confirm current terms with the venue.
A source review is not a security audit, recommendation, or guarantee that the product is available in your region.

Metrics and coverage

This release does not show volume, open interest, funding, or execution-cost estimates. We will add figures when data access is permitted and definitions and timestamps are comparable across venues and markets. Missing values are never shown as zero.

The 47 reference-directory entries are one discovery source; a focused independent review added 13 candidates. The ledger now has 60 candidates, with one still pending. This set does not establish complete market coverage.

View the reference directory

Back to directory

Inclusion criteria

We confirm that the product offers perpetual contracts and record its current lifecycle status.

We review the official domain, network or namespace, and execution and settlement model where the sources publish them.

We distinguish protocols, venues, frontends, and deployments. Multiple interfaces over the same contracts are not automatically counted as separate protocols.

Closed products are archived; products outside crypto perps and products without enough classification remain outside published profiles.

Sources and dates

We prioritize official protocol documentation, apps, terms, APIs, and announcements.

Each profile claim links to a source and shows when it was last checked.

Fees, leverage, access, markets, and collateral may depend on the account and change over time; confirm current terms with the venue.

A source review is not a security audit, recommendation, or guarantee that the product is available in your region.

Metrics and coverage

View the reference directory