A synthetic dollar held stable by a hedged position, not by cash in a bank.
Live market data
CoinGecko data; may be delayed.
89.4% of the achievable supply is already circulating.
$1.52 -86.33% · Apr 11, 2024
Source: CoinGecko, snapshot of Oct 26, 2026. Figures may be delayed.
Source: DefiLlama, data as of · Revenue is not reported by every protocol.. Figures are informational, not financial advice.
Ethena's USDe is not backed by dollars in a bank account. It holds crypto collateral and simultaneously opens an equal short position in perpetual futures, so a fall in the collateral's price is offset by a gain on the short. The yield comes largely from funding rates paid by traders who are long. This is a genuinely different mechanism from a fiat-backed stablecoin, and it carries genuinely different risks that deserve to be understood before use.
Understand that this is a hedged trading position, not a cash-backed stablecoin.
Yield depends on funding rates, which are cyclical and can turn negative.
Exchange counterparty risk is central here, because the hedge lives on trading venues.
The protocol holds crypto assets and shorts an equivalent notional amount in perpetual futures, a structure known as a delta-neutral position: gains on one leg cancel losses on the other, so the combined value stays near a dollar regardless of price direction. Perpetual futures charge a periodic funding payment between longs and shorts. When markets are bullish, longs pay shorts, and Ethena, holding the short side, collects that flow and passes it on as yield.
Governance over protocol parameters and risk settings
Exposure to the synthetic dollar ecosystem's growth
Incentive programs tied to protocol usage
The yield is real but conditional, and describing it otherwise would be misleading. It depends on funding rates staying positive, which happens when traders are net bullish. In prolonged bearish or neutral markets, funding can invert and the position pays out instead of earning. This is a market-structure trade offered in the wrapper of a dollar token, and it should be evaluated as such rather than as a savings product.
USDe supply is not capped and expands/contracts purely on mint-and-redeem demand: users deposit stables or crypto, Ethena hedges the delta and mints USDe, and the reverse on redemption. The dominant supply consideration is not a schedule but the mechanism itself — USDe's stability depends on the basis trade staying profitable and funding rates staying positive; sustained negative funding would force hedge losses onto the protocol. The ENA token has a fixed max supply with multi-year unlocks published and trackable.
Ethena governance runs through the Ethena Council — a multi-sig of ecosystem entities with formal risk-committee powers — plus token voting via ENA on certain parameters after the 2024 risk-framework proposals. Risk settings (collateral eligibility, exchange venue policy) are set by a risk committee with formal sign-off. The honest description: governance is professionalized and centralized in practice, with token holders consulted but not decisive on the levers that matter most for stability.
Negative funding: in bearish or neutral markets the strategy can cost money instead of earning it.
Exchange counterparty risk: the hedge depends on centralized venues remaining solvent and accessible.
Custody risk for collateral held with third parties supporting the hedge.
Liquidity stress: a rapid wave of redemptions requires unwinding derivative positions into moving markets.
Complexity risk: many users hold it as if it were a fiat-backed stablecoin without understanding the mechanism.
It is a different risk profile, not simply a safer or riskier version. Fiat-backed stablecoins carry bank and issuer risk; USDe instead carries derivatives, exchange counterparty and funding-rate risk. It does not depend on a bank, but it does depend on centralized trading venues functioning and on market structure staying favourable. Treating the two as interchangeable is the mistake to avoid.
Ethena holds spot collateral (stables, ETH, BTC) and shorts an equal notional on perpetual futures; the short collects the funding rate when funding is positive, and the combined position stays delta-neutral. That funding income subsidizes USDe'+s+'s yield — and the reverse is also true: negative funding turns the hedge into a cost. USDe'+s+'s stability is therefore a bet on perpetuals-market structure, not a custodial reserve model like Tether or USDC.
The staked version of USDe that accrues the protocol'+s+'s yield. Its yield is the funding-rate spread plus staking rewards minus protocol cut, and it is variable — it can approach zero when perp funding is flat or negative. sUSDe is not a fixed-income product, and treating it like one is the most common analytical mistake around Ethena.
Last verified:
Ethena · ethena.fi · primary source
The project's official site, retrieved on the date shown, supporting how it describes itself. It does not establish supply, governance or issuance mechanics.
Accessed
Listed as an organization active in this asset's ecosystem.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
Adjacent asset in the same research context.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
Serves a comparable role, so the two are worth reading side by side.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
Serves a comparable role, so the two are worth reading side by side.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
Serves a comparable role, so the two are worth reading side by side.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
Adjacent asset in the same research context.
Directory suggestion, pending verification.
